DOMESTIC VIOLENCE & AVO DEFENCE
Charged with Domestic Violence in NSW?
Experienced Legal Representation for Domestic Violence & AVO Matters in all Sydney Courts
Early legal advice can make a significant difference to your case outcome.
Call Now - Speak With a Defence LawyerCore Defence Initial Assessment
We provide same day case assessment
What type of matter do you need help with?
Select the area that best describes your legal matter
What Is At Risk If You Are Charged With Domestic Violence?
Seeking early legal advice is recommended if you have been charged with a domestic violence offence or served with an AVO.
What Happens When You Are Charged with Domestic Violence
Police Fact Sheets Establish the Crown's Case
The police facts presented at your first court appearance form the basis of the prosecution case. Understanding these allegations early is essential.
Interim Orders May Affect Your Living Situation
Interim conditions may prevent you from returning home or having contact with family members. These can be reviewed and varied by the court.
Evidence Must Be Preserved Early
CCTV footage, body-worn camera recordings, text messages, and medical records may be important to your defence. Acting quickly ensures evidence is not lost.
Early Engagement With the Prosecution
Early contact with the prosecution may result in charge withdrawal, downgrading of offences, or agreement on factual matters.
Court Preparation From Day One
A defence prepared from the outset -- with organised evidence and strategic planning -- is substantially stronger than last-minute preparation.
UNDERSTANDING YOUR CHARGES
How the Court Assesses Domestic Violence Cases
In NSW, domestic violence matters are determined according to the criminal standard of proof. The prosecution must prove each element of the charge beyond reasonable doubt.
What the Prosecution Must Prove
The specific elements vary by charge, but domestic violence matters typically require proof of:
Common Assault (Domestic)
CRIMES ACT 1900 (NSW), S 61
- The accused applied force to the complainant, or caused the complainant to apprehend immediate unlawful violence
- The application of force or threat was intentional or reckless
- The complainant did not consent (where relevant)
- The accused and complainant were in a domestic relationship
Contravene AVO (Domestic)
CRIMES (DOMESTIC AND PERSONAL VIOLENCE) ACT 2007 (NSW), S 14
- An AVO was in force at the relevant time
- The accused knew of the AVO (or is deemed to have known)
- The accused contravened a prohibition or restriction in the AVO
Stalk or Intimidate
CRIMES (DOMESTIC AND PERSONAL VIOLENCE) ACT 2007 (NSW), S 13
- The accused stalked or intimidated the complainant
- The accused intended to cause fear of physical or mental harm
- The accused and complainant were in a domestic relationship
Key Evidence Considerations in Domestic Violence Cases
Domestic violence prosecutions depend heavily on evidence assessment. Courts consider three critical stages when evaluating the prosecution case:
Credibility Assessment
The court evaluates the reliability and consistency of the complainant's account.
- Whether the account remains consistent across police calls, initial statements, and court evidence
- The complainant's demeanour and whether it aligns with the allegations
- Inconsistencies between different versions of events
- Whether the account is realistic given the circumstances
Evidence Interpretation
Where evidence exists, the court must interpret its meaning and relevance.
- Body-worn footage that may not clearly show the alleged conduct
- Photographs of injuries that may have alternative explanations
- Text messages or communications that may have multiple interpretations
Standard of Proof
Even where evidence exists, it must satisfy the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
- Corroborating evidence beyond the complainant's word
- Whether alternative explanations exist that are reasonably consistent with innocence
- Whether the evidence, taken as a whole, meets the required threshold
Evidence Issues That Matter Most
Body-Worn Video
BWV is often the most significant evidence in domestic violence matters. Courts assess:
Demeanour of complainant
Does observed demeanour match allegations of serious violence?
Initial account
What did the complainant first tell police? How does this compare to later versions?
Scene observations
Is there physical evidence consistent with alleged events?
Accused response
What did the accused say when first questioned?
Complainant Credibility
Courts assess the reliability of complainant evidence according to well-established principles:
Consistency
Has the account remained consistent across the police call, initial complaint, formal statement, and any court evidence?
Independence
Has the complainant discussed events with others before providing their account?
Plausibility
Is the account realistic and consistent with the known circumstances?
Motive
Are there any reasons the complainant might have to give false or exaggerated evidence?
Judicial Reasoning in Practice
Magistrates deciding domestic violence matters apply established principles:
"The fact that a witness is honestly seeking to tell the truth does not mean that his or her evidence is reliable."
R v Markuleski (2001) 52 NSWLR 82
Courts recognise that domestic violence matters present particular challenges. Complainants may be reluctant, evidence may be limited to the parties themselves, and context is often disputed.
However, the criminal standard applies without modification. The prosecution must prove each element beyond reasonable doubt, and the tribunal of fact must not convict merely because they believe the complainant. They must be satisfied that the complainant's evidence is reliable and that there is no reasonable possibility consistent with innocence.
In Murray v The Queen (2002) 211 CLR 193, the High Court emphasised that even where a complainant is believed, the question remains whether their evidence establishes each element beyond reasonable doubt. Belief is not the same as proof.
Strategic Defence Considerations
Defence analysis in domestic violence matters focuses on:
Early Evidence Gathering
Identifying and preserving evidence that may be relevant to the defence before it is lost, including CCTV footage, witness accounts, and communication records.
Document Review
Obtaining and reviewing records that may be relevant, including medical records, communications, and other relevant material.
Cross-Examination Preparation
Preparing structured cross-examination to test the reliability and consistency of evidence presented by the prosecution.
Court Submissions
Organising closing submissions to demonstrate how the evidence meets or fails to meet the required legal standard.
Related: AVO Proceedings
AVO applications are civil proceedings with a lower standard of proof (balance of probabilities). However, the factual findings in AVO proceedings may have implications for related criminal charges.
Strategic decisions about AVO matters -- whether to consent, contest, or seek conditions -- must be made with reference to any pending or potential criminal charges.
Read more in our Knowledge BaseIf you have been charged with a domestic violence offence or served with an AVO, speak to a lawyer for advice.
Call Now - 0410 630 671Apprehended Violence Orders (AVO Lawyer Parramatta)
An AVO does not require a criminal charge, yet it carries enforceable conditions that affect where you live, who you contact, and how you interact with your children. Provisional AVOs are issued by police on the spot. Interim AVOs are imposed by the court at the first mention.
We defend contested AVO hearings at Parramatta Local Court, apply to vary or revoke conditions, and advise on the strategic implications of consenting to an AVO without admissions.
Domestic Assault Charges
There is no separate offence of “domestic assault” in NSW. Assault charges in a domestic relationship -- common assault (s 61 Crimes Act 1900) or assault occasioning actual bodily harm (s 59) -- are prosecuted under standard provisions, but the domestic relationship is treated as an aggravating factor on sentence.
Our defence strategies include self-defence arguments, challenging the reliability of the complainant, contesting identification, and presenting evidence that contradicts the prosecution case.
Breach of AVO
Contravening an AVO under s 14 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 carries a maximum penalty of 2 years imprisonment and/or 50 penalty units. Even technical breaches -- such as inadvertent contact via social media -- can result in arrest and prosecution.
We challenge the prosecution's evidence of knowledge and intent, contest whether the alleged conduct actually breaches the specific conditions imposed, and pursue withdrawal where the evidence is weak.
Strangulation Allegations
Intentional choking, suffocation, or strangulation under s 37(1A) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) carries a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment, or 10 years when committed against a domestic partner. These charges are treated with particular seriousness by courts and the prosecution.
We scrutinise medical evidence, challenge the mechanism alleged, and examine the reliability and consistency of the complainant's account to build a robust defence.
Intimidation & Stalking
Stalking or intimidation with intent to cause fear of physical or mental harm is an offence under s 13 of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), carrying a maximum penalty of 5 years imprisonment or 50 penalty units. The prosecution must prove the conduct was intended to cause fear.
We challenge the element of intent, examine the context of the alleged conduct, and present alternative explanations to the court.
Representation in Court
Listing Procedures
We understand how NSW Local Courts manage domestic violence lists, including mention days, adjournment protocols, and case management directions.
Interim Order Variations
We apply to vary restrictive interim AVO conditions at the earliest opportunity, ensuring you can maintain employment, housing, and appropriate family contact.
Early Negotiations
Engaging with the prosecution before the matter is set for hearing can result in charge withdrawal, downgrading of offences, or agreed facts that support a more favourable outcome.
Contested Hearings
When matters proceed to a defended hearing, we are prepared with a comprehensive cross-examination strategy, defence evidence, and persuasive submissions.
WHY CHOOSE US
Why Choose Core Defence Lawyers
Experienced representation when your future depends on the outcome
Former Government Prosecutor
Our Principal Solicitor previously worked as a government prosecutor, giving us unique insight into how the prosecution builds cases.
Dedicated Criminal Law Focus
We exclusively practice criminal defence law. This dedication means superior knowledge and better outcomes for our clients.
24/7 Emergency Availability
Arrested or need urgent legal advice? We're available around the clock for bail applications and emergency matters.
Fixed Fees & Transparent Pricing
No hidden costs or bill shock. We provide fixed fee quotes upfront so you know exactly what your defence will cost.
Direct Principal Solicitor Access
Clients deal directly with the Principal Solicitor, supported by an experienced criminal defence team where appropriate.
Demonstrated Experience
Experience securing favourable outcomes where supported by the evidence, including acquittals, withdrawn charges, and section 10 dismissals.
Free Initial Consultation
Receive honest, obligation-free advice about your case and options. We'll tell you where you stand from the outset.
Direct Lawyer Contact
Speak directly with your lawyer, not a receptionist. We believe in personal service and clear communication.
PRINCIPAL SOLICITOR
Meet Your Defence Lawyer
Mr Joshua Jung
Principal Solicitor
Admitted 2016
DV
Specialist Focus
Former
Government Prosecutor
Admitted as a lawyer in 2016, Mr Joshua Jung has built extensive experience across all levels of criminal defence practice, including as a government prosecutor for local and State Government.
This prosecutorial background provides him with a unique and strategic advantage when defending criminal matters, particularly in understanding procedure, evidentiary weaknesses, and prosecution strategy.
Domestic Violence Specialist
Mr Joshua Jung has a particular focus on Domestic Violence matters and is highly experienced in contesting AVOs and defending domestic violence charges. He is known for providing straightforward, transparent, and realistic advice.
“At the core of every case is an accused person who is entitled to the fundamental presumption of innocence.”
-- Mr Joshua Jung, Principal Solicitor
OUR APPROACH
How We Work
Free Consultation
Contact us for a confidential, no-obligation consultation. We'll listen to your matter and provide initial advice.
Case Assessment
We thoroughly review your matter, examine the evidence, and identify available defence options.
Strategic Defence
We build a strong defence tailored to your circumstances, negotiating with prosecutors and preparing for court.
Court Representation
Our experienced advocates represent you in court, pursuing the most favourable outcome available in your circumstances.
KNOWLEDGE BASE
Understand Your Legal Position
Access our comprehensive legal resources to understand the charges, evidence, court process, and sentencing options relevant to your matter.
FAQ
Domestic Violence & AVO FAQ
The First 72 Hours Matter
Statements made to police lock the narrative early and are difficult to retract.
Interim AVO conditions can affect your housing, employment, and contact with family members immediately.
Early mistakes in how you respond to allegations are difficult to reverse later in proceedings.
Call Before Your Court Date
Speak With a Defence Lawyer Now